Aronil - Latest Comments in Science versus philosophy

Re: Science versus philosophy

Fikri — Sat, 16 Apr 2005 11:19:01 -0000

Why does it have to be either one? Can't it be both?

Or neither of them? :>

Re: Science versus philosophy

Aronil — Tue, 08 Mar 2005 08:51:13 -0000

Hehe tertarik girl, you have captured what i was trying to put in to feeble words ^_^.

Re: Science versus philosophy

tehtarik — Tue, 08 Mar 2005 00:06:29 -0000

Philosophy is definitely not irrational. Paul was a great philosopher, so to speak; and Jesus was even greater. Rather than contradicting science, philosophy goes hand-in-hand with it.Both requires the faculty of Reason, just that science is measured and quantified with empirical methods and philosophy, with logic and ideas. Perhaps, what makes philosophy seems merely theoretical is because the weightage of its worth cannot be measured by quantifiable benchmarks. Not everything needs to be proven mathematically or scientifically for its worth to be known. Perhaps, just perhaps; there is no such thing as science vs philosophy after all; rather; science vs bad philosophy. Then we can start debating on its irrationality.

Re: Science versus philosophy

Anonymous — Mon, 07 Mar 2005 21:30:08 -0000

interesting but errr..what's your point? *scratch* scratch*

If science does not involve theology as you've stated...can science support theology?

-enn@j