DISQUS

DISQUS Hello! Aronil is using DISQUS, a powerful comment system, to manage its comments. Learn more.

Community Page

Jump to original thread »
Author

Science versus philosophy

Started by linoralow · 8 months ago

Science seeks to know more and more about less and less until it knows everything about nothing. Philosophy seeks to know less and less about more and more until it knows nothing about everything. How many of you can agree with these…statements? Or just this line for that matter? ... Continue reading »

4 comments

  • interesting but errr..what's your point? *scratch* scratch*


    If science does not involve theology as you've stated...can science support theology?



    -enn@j
  • Philosophy is definitely not irrational. Paul was a great philosopher, so to speak; and Jesus was even greater. Rather than contradicting science, philosophy goes hand-in-hand with it.Both requires the faculty of Reason, just that science is measured and quantified with empirical methods and philosophy, with logic and ideas. Perhaps, what makes philosophy seems merely theoretical is because the weightage of its worth cannot be measured by quantifiable benchmarks. Not everything needs to be proven mathematically or scientifically for its worth to be known. Perhaps, just perhaps; there is no such thing as science vs philosophy after all; rather; science vs bad philosophy. Then we can start debating on its irrationality.
  • Hehe tertarik girl, you have captured what i was trying to put in to feeble words ^_^.
  • Why does it have to be either one? Can't it be both?


    Or neither of them? :>

Add New Comment

Returning? Login